Open post

Art AI Festival catches up with Sofia Crespo

Sofia Crespo is one of the artists we exhibited at this year’s Art AI Festival.  Her bio-inspired work, entitled Neural Zoo, was on display during the Festival in both Highcross and Haymarket shopping centres.  It is visually stunning work, and attracted a lot of public attention during the Festival.

In describing her work, Sofia said that one of her main foci is the way organic life uses artificial mechanisms to simulate itself and evolve, which implies the idea that technologies are a biased product of the organic life that created them and not a completely separated object.

Neural Zoo is an exploration of the ways creativity works: the combination of known elements into a new previously unseen element. The work has been made in collaboration with a convolutional neural network. The images resemble nature, but they represent an imagined nature that has been rearranged. Computer vision and machine learning have been used to generate a speculative “naturess” that can only be accessed through high levels of parallel computation.

one of the art pieces exhibited during the Art AI Festival 2019

We had the chance to ask her a few questions after the Festival had wrapped – and below are her answers.

Why do you use AI to create the images?

I enjoy the feeling of not knowing what to expect when I process a dataset. I love how machine learning algorithms have helped me grow me from my own way of designing and thinking about an image by showing me different layouts and arrangements that I hadn’t imagined before.

Why images and not video or other art form?  

I am actually working on a long video sequence right now. Images are just the beginning for me, I guess because they’re just a single frame and 2D. It’d be nice to process moving sequences and work with 3D models in the future.

How do you decide which images to select?

They are selected intuitively, mainly inspired by nature. I quite like the idea of using algorithms inspired by the functioning of the brain to imagine natural shapes, creating a new texture biodiversity within a digital environment.

How is your work developing through the use of AI and what do you see as the main challenges for your style of artwork in the use of AI?

The challenges are mainly technical knowledge, and hardware. I wish I could collaborate with Machine Learning engineers at some point to continue expanding and understanding what’s possible using the technologies we currently have. My work is developing highly shaped by technology, since I’m challenged to think about what I want to communicate within what I find technically worth pursuing.

We very much look forward to seeing more of Sofia’s imaginative bio-inspired work as it continues to evolve in the future.

Open post

Art AI Festival 2019 launch programme “Human+Machine” begins with a guest lecture by Prof Gerhard Fischer

Prof Gerhard Fischer began the “Human+Machine” launch events for the 2019 Art AI Festival with a lecture on human-computer design and the roles of creative artificial intelligence (AI) – see also https://art-ai.dmu.ac.uk/event/the-human-in-the-design/.  He positioned creative AI firstly with an historical overview (fig 1) which ultimately demonstrated how technology today is indelibly linked with creative practice.

Fig 1

 

He then went on to discuss the future of digitalization, stating it is the design trade-offs that lead to creativity but this is an inevitable balance between AI and human centred design (fig 2), providing various examples that illustrate his viewpoint (fig 3).

Fig 2

 

Fig 3

 

In turn, this highlights the differences and similarities between the AI (fig 4) and human-centred design (fig 5) perspectives.

Fig 4

Fig 5

 

There are, however, three basic views of AI among researchers and citizens: utopia, dystopia and realistic (fig 6).

Fig 6

The main question this leads to is: just because technology enables us to do something, should it be done?  Gerhard concludes the future is not ‘out there to be discovered’ but it has to be ‘invented and designed’.  He argues there is a need for alternatives to the ‘AI view’ of a digitized future and that approaches used should enhance and empower individuals and societies to become more creative.  And yet, who will be that inventor/designer?  Should this be left to AI utopians (eg., Google, etc.) and how will their successes be measured for the good of humankind as a whole?

 

In this short video, Gerhard summarizes his talk and viewpoint.

 

 

Scroll to top